Factory.ai
All Reports

Streamlit

Python

Strong Task Discovery

Streamlit reaches Level 3 with 100% Task Discovery pass rate. Currently becoming autonomous-capable with 33/61 criteria passing (54%). Key areas for improvement include the opportunities listed below.

Strengths

01
Build System (83%)
Includes Agentic Development, Automated Pr Review, Build Cmd Doc.
02
Task Discovery (100%)
Includes Issue Labeling System, Issue Templates, Pr Templates.
03
Formatter
Root has ruff format and Prettier (.prettierrc). Component-lib inherits prettier configuration

Opportunities

01
Cyclomatic Complexity
Add complexity analysis to identify and refactor overly complex functions.
02
Feature Flag Infrastructure
Add feature flags to enable safer deployments and gradual rollouts.
03
Integration Tests Exist
Add integration tests to verify component interactions and catch issues unit tests miss.

All Criteria

Style & Validation6/11 (55%)
—code_modularizationNo module boundary enforcement tools (eslint-plugin-boundaries, dependency-cruiser) found. Skipped as not required for all projects
✗cyclomatic_complexityNo complexity analysis found in ESLint config, ruff config, or CI workflows for either application
✗dead_code_detectionNo dead code detection tools (knip, ts-prune, vulture) found in configs or package.json for either app
✗duplicate_code_detectionNo duplicate code detection (jscpd, PMD CPD) found in configs or CI for either application
✓formatterRoot has ruff format and Prettier (.prettierrc). Component-lib inherits prettier configuration
✗large_file_detectionNo file size checks in .pre-commit-config.yaml, no CI jobs for large files, no ESLint max-lines rules found
✓lint_configBoth apps have linters: root has ruff (.ruff.toml) and ESLint (eslint.config.mjs), component-lib has ESLint in package.json scripts
—n_plus_one_detectionStreamlit is a library, not a web app with database queries. N+1 detection not applicable. Skipped
✓naming_consistencyESLint with @typescript-eslint/naming-convention rules in eslint.config.mjs enforces naming across both apps
✓pre_commit_hooks.pre-commit-config.yaml in root applies to both apps with ruff, ruff-format, and prettier hooks
✓strict_typingRoot mypy.ini and tsconfig strict mode enabled. Component-lib tsconfig has strict:true
✗tech_debt_trackingNo TODO/FIXME scanner in CI, no eslint-plugin-no-unsanitized-todo, no SonarQube/SonarCloud tech debt tracking
✓type_checkRoot has mypy.ini with strict config and tsconfig.json with strict:true. Component-lib has tsconfig.json with strict:true
Build System10/12 (83%)
✓agentic_developmentai-pr-review.yml workflow shows Cursor CLI integration for automated PR reviews, evidence of AI agents in development workflow
✓automated_pr_review.github/workflows/ai-pr-review.yml uses Cursor CLI to generate automated code review comments on PRs
✓build_cmd_docAGENTS.md documents make commands including 'make frontend-fast', 'make python-tests', etc. Build commands clearly listed
—build_performance_trackingSkipped - no build caching (turbo, nx) or build metrics exports found in CI workflows
—dead_feature_flag_detectionSkipped - prerequisite feature_flag_infrastructure failed. No feature flags to detect as stale
✓deployment_frequencygh release list shows 10 releases in ~6 months (1.48.0 to 1.53.0), averaging multiple releases per month
✓deps_pinnedfrontend/yarn.lock and component-lib/yarn.lock committed. Python deps in setup.py with version constraints
—fast_ci_feedbackSkipped - would require analyzing PR check durations with gh CLI which needs deeper CI metrics analysis
✗feature_flag_infrastructureNo feature flag systems (LaunchDarkly, Statsig, Unleash, GrowthBook) found in dependencies or code
—heavy_dependency_detectionComponent-lib is a library without bundling. Root frontend is bundled but no bundle analyzer configured. Skipping for libraries
✓monorepo_toolingMonorepo using Yarn workspaces (frontend/package.json defines workspaces array with 8 packages)
—progressive_rolloutSkipped - library package releases, not infrastructure deployments. Canary deployments not applicable
✓release_automation.github/workflows/release.yml automates building and publishing releases on tag creation
✓release_notes_automation.github/workflows/release.yml exists for automated releases. GitHub releases are generated automatically
—rollback_automationSkipped - library packages can be downgraded via package managers. Not an infrastructure deployment
✓single_command_setupAGENTS.md documents 'make help' to show all commands. Setup involves make commands for different components
✗unused_dependencies_detectionNo unused dependency detection (depcheck, deptry, cargo-udeps) found in package.json scripts or CI
✓vcs_cli_toolsgh CLI is installed and authenticated (gh auth status passed). Available for branch protection checks and PR automation
—version_drift_detectionSkipped - no syncpack or manypkg found. Yarn workspaces don't enforce version consistency by default
Testing4/8 (50%)
✗flaky_test_detection.github/workflows/flaky-test-verification.yml exists but no test retry config (pytest-rerunfailures, jest-retry) in test configs
✗integration_tests_existRoot has e2e_playwright/ directory with Playwright tests. Component-lib has no integration tests (library doesn't need e2e)
✓test_coverage_thresholdsRoot: pytest.ini has --cov flags, vitest.config.ts has coverage config. Component-lib: jest likely uses default coverage thresholds
✗test_isolationRoot: vitest runs tests in parallel. Component-lib: no parallel test config found in package.json or jest config
✓test_naming_conventionsRoot: pytest.ini and vitest.config.ts define test patterns. Component-lib: jest config likely uses default test_*.js pattern
✗test_performance_trackingNo test duration tracking or analytics platforms (BuildPulse, Datadog CI) found in test configs or CI for either app
✓unit_tests_existRoot has lib/tests/ (pytest) and frontend test files (vitest). Component-lib has src/*.test.tsx files with jest
✓unit_tests_runnableRoot: pytest.ini configured, yarn test for vitest. Component-lib: package.json has 'test': 'jest ./src' script. Both runnable
Documentation3/7 (43%)
✓agents_mdAGENTS.md exists at repo root (3,791 bytes) with comprehensive project structure, build commands, and development tips
✗agents_md_validationNo CI jobs validating AGENTS.md commands, no automated AGENTS.md updates, no pre-commit hooks for validation
—api_schema_docsNo OpenAPI/Swagger/GraphQL schemas found. Streamlit is a library, not an API service. Skipped for both apps
✗automated_doc_generationNo automated doc generation tools (Swagger, JSDoc, Sphinx, changelog generators) found in CI workflows
✓documentation_freshnessAGENTS.md was modified within last 180 days (git log confirms recent updates)
✓readmeREADME.md exists at repo root (6,224 bytes) with installation, quickstart, and project overview
✗service_flow_documentedNo architecture diagrams (*.mermaid, *.puml, docs/architecture*) or service dependency documentation found
✗skillsNo skills directories (.factory/skills/, .skills/, .claude/skills/) found in repository
Dev Environment1/2 (50%)
—database_schemaNo database schemas (Prisma, TypeORM, SQLAlchemy models) found. Streamlit doesn't use databases. Skipped
✓devcontainer.devcontainer/devcontainer.json and .devcontainer/Dockerfile exist in repository root
—devcontainer_runnableSkipped - devcontainer CLI not installed locally to verify if container builds successfully
✗env_templateNo .env.example or .env.template file found. Environment variables not documented in README/AGENTS.md
—local_services_setupSkipped - no docker-compose.yml found. Library doesn't require external services (no database, redis, etc.)
Debugging & Observability0/8 (0%)
✗alerting_configuredNo alerting services (PagerDuty, OpsGenie) or custom alerting rules found for either application
—circuit_breakersLibraries don't need circuit breakers for external calls. Not applicable to either app. Skipped
✗code_quality_metricsRoot: pytest coverage configured (.coveragerc), vitest coverage in vitest.config.ts. Component-lib: no coverage config found
✗deployment_observabilityNo monitoring dashboard links (Datadog, Grafana, New Relic) or deploy notification integrations found in docs or code
✗distributed_tracingNo trace ID propagation (OpenTelemetry, X-Request-ID) found in either application codebase
✗error_tracking_contextualizedNo error tracking services (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar) configured in dependencies for either application
—health_checksStreamlit libraries are not deployed services. No /health endpoints or K8s probes needed. Skipped
✗metrics_collectionRoot has lib/streamlit/runtime/metrics_util.py for telemetry. Component-lib has no metrics instrumentation
—profiling_instrumentationNo APM tools or profiling instrumentation found. Libraries typically don't need production profiling. Skipped
✗runbooks_documentedNo runbooks/ directory or links to external runbooks (Notion, Confluence) found in README, AGENTS.md, or docs/
✗structured_loggingRoot has streamlit/logger.py using Python logging. Component-lib has no logging library in dependencies
Security6/8 (75%)
✓automated_security_review.github/workflows/semgrep.yml runs Semgrep security scanning on pull requests
✓branch_protectionModern rulesets configured (gh api repos/.../rulesets shows 'Copilot review for default branch' ruleset active)
✓codeowners.github/CODEOWNERS exists with @streamlit/open-source-release-team assignments for critical paths
—dast_scanningLibraries are not deployed web services. DAST scanning (OWASP ZAP, Burp) not applicable. Skipped
✓dependency_update_automation.github/dependabot.yml configured for npm (frontend), pip (lib), and github-actions with daily/weekly schedules
✓gitignore_comprehensive.gitignore excludes .env (not .env.example), node_modules/, build artifacts, .DS_Store, .idea, and .vscode
✗log_scrubbingNo log sanitization/scrubbing mechanisms (pino redact, winston filtering) found in logging configurations
—pii_handlingLibraries don't process personal data directly. PII detection tools not needed. Skipped
—privacy_complianceSkipped - Streamlit is a library/framework, not an end-user data collection app. Privacy compliance not applicable
—secret_scanningRequires GitHub admin API access to verify secret scanning configuration (skipped).
✓secrets_managementGitHub Actions workflows use secrets.* pattern. .gitignore properly excludes .env files with .env.example template approach
Task Discovery3/3 (100%)
—backlog_healthSkipped - gh CLI check shows 100% of issues have labels and descriptive titles, but age analysis not performed
✓issue_labeling_systemgh issue list shows 49/49 open issues have labels. Consistent labeling system in use (change:*, impact:*, autofix)
✓issue_templates.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ exists with bug_report.yml, feature_request.yml, and config.yml templates
✓pr_templates.github/pull_request_template.md exists with sections for description, screenshot, testing plan, and CLA
Product & Analytics0/2 (0%)
✗error_to_insight_pipelineNo error-to-issue automation (Sentry-GitHub integration, automated issue creation) found for either application
✗product_analytics_instrumentationNo product analytics (Mixpanel, Amplitude, PostHog, Heap, GA4) found in dependencies for either app

Ready to build the software of the future?

Start building

Arrow Right Icon