All Reports
aiohttp
Python
aio-libs/aiohttp
Pass Rate
54%
Asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python
L1100%
L2100%
L370%
L40%
L50%
Strong Testing
aiohttp reaches Level 3 with 88% Testing pass rate. Currently becoming autonomous-capable with 33/61 criteria passing (54%). Key areas for improvement include the opportunities listed below.
Strengths
01
Testing (88%)
Includes Integration Tests Exist, Test Coverage Thresholds, Test Isolation.
02
Formatter
Black formatter configured in .pre-commit-config.yaml
03
Large File Detection
.pre-commit-config.yaml has check-added-large-files hook to detect large files
Opportunities
01
Cyclomatic Complexity
Add complexity analysis to identify and refactor overly complex functions.
02
Feature Flag Infrastructure
Add feature flags to enable safer deployments and gradual rollouts.
03
Skills
Create .factory/skills to give agents reusable, tested capabilities for common tasks.
All Criteria
Style & Validation7/11 (64%)
—code_modularizationSkipped - no clear evidence of boundary enforcement tooling
✗cyclomatic_complexityNo complexity analysis tools (ESLint complexity, lizard, radon, SonarQube) configured
✗dead_code_detectionNo dead code detection tools (vulture, dead, knip, SonarQube) configured
✗duplicate_code_detectionNo duplicate code detection tools (jscpd, PMD CPD, SonarQube) configured
✓formatterBlack formatter configured in .pre-commit-config.yaml
✓large_file_detection.pre-commit-config.yaml has check-added-large-files hook to detect large files
✓lint_configflake8 configured in setup.cfg with multiple plugins, enforced via pre-commit
—n_plus_one_detectionSkipped - library without database/ORM usage
✓naming_consistencyflake8 configured with naming convention checks (N801, N802, N803)
✓pre_commit_hooks.pre-commit-config.yaml exists with black, isort, flake8, and other hooks
✓strict_typingmypy configured with comprehensive strict settings in .mypy.ini
✗tech_debt_trackingNo TODO/FIXME scanner, SonarQube, or tech debt tracking tools configured
✓type_checkmypy.ini with strict type checking enabled (disallow_any_*, disallow_untyped_*)
Build System6/11 (55%)
✗agentic_developmentNo agent co-authorship in git history, no agent CI workflows, no agent configuration directories
✗automated_pr_reviewNo automated PR review generation detected (no danger.js, droid exec reviews, or AI review bots)
✓build_cmd_docREADME.rst documents installation/setup, Makefile has install and test commands
✗build_performance_trackingNo build caching, build metrics export, or build performance monitoring configured
—dead_feature_flag_detectionSkipped - no feature flag infrastructure exists
—deployment_frequencySkipped - this is a library package, not a deployed service
✓deps_pinnedrequirements/*.txt files have pinned versions for all dependencies
—fast_ci_feedbackSkipped - complex to calculate accurate CI duration from status check data
✗feature_flag_infrastructureNo feature flag system (LaunchDarkly, Statsig, Unleash, etc.) configured
—heavy_dependency_detectionSkipped - not a bundled application
—monorepo_toolingSkipped - single-application repository
—progressive_rolloutSkipped - not an infrastructure repository
✓release_automationGitHub Actions CI/CD workflow automates builds and releases with tag-based triggers
✓release_notes_automationtowncrier configured in pyproject.toml for automated changelog/release notes generation
—rollback_automationSkipped - not an infrastructure repository
✓single_command_setupMakefile documents 'make install-dev' and 'make test', README has setup instructions
✗unused_dependencies_detectionNo unused dependency detection tools (depcheck, deptry, cargo-udeps) configured
✓vcs_cli_toolsgh CLI (v2.52.0) is installed and authenticated
—version_drift_detectionSkipped - single-application repository
Testing7/8 (88%)
✗flaky_test_detectionNo test retry configuration or flaky test tracking tools detected
✓integration_tests_existFunctional/integration tests exist (test_*_functional.py files)
✓test_coverage_thresholdspytest-cov configured with coverage tracking, codecov integration visible in README badge
✓test_isolationpytest-xdist configured with --numprocesses=auto for parallel test execution
✓test_naming_conventionspytest configured with test file patterns in setup.cfg
✓test_performance_trackingpytest configured with --durations=10 flag in setup.cfg to track slow tests
✓unit_tests_existExtensive test suite exists in tests/ directory with test_*.py files
✓unit_tests_runnablepytest configured in setup.cfg, runnable via Makefile 'make test' command
Documentation3/6 (50%)
✗agents_mdNo AGENTS.md file at repository root
—agents_md_validationSkipped - prerequisite agents_md does not pass
—api_schema_docsSkipped - library without HTTP API endpoints
✓automated_doc_generationSphinx docs with 'make doc' command, towncrier for automated changelogs
✓documentation_freshnessCONTRIBUTING.rst was modified within last 180 days
✓readmeREADME.rst exists with comprehensive setup and usage instructions
✗service_flow_documentedNo architecture diagrams (.mermaid, .puml) or service flow documentation found
✗skillsNo skills directories (.factory/skills/, .skills/, .claude/skills/) found
Dev Environment0/2 (0%)
—database_schemaSkipped - no database usage
✗devcontainerNo .devcontainer/devcontainer.json configuration found
—devcontainer_runnableSkipped - no devcontainer exists
✗env_templateNo .env.example, .env.template, or environment variable documentation found
—local_services_setupSkipped - library without external service dependencies
Debugging & Observability2/9 (22%)
✗alerting_configuredNo alerting system (PagerDuty, OpsGenie) configured
—circuit_breakersSkipped - no external service dependencies
✓code_quality_metricscodecov badge in README, pytest-cov configured for coverage tracking
✗deployment_observabilityNo monitoring dashboard references (Datadog, Grafana, New Relic) in docs
✗distributed_tracingtracing.py exists but is for client request tracing, not distributed trace IDs
✗error_tracking_contextualizedNo error tracking tools (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar) configured
—health_checksSkipped - library, not a deployed service
✗metrics_collectionNo metrics/telemetry instrumentation (Datadog, Prometheus, etc.) found
✗profiling_instrumentationNo profiling infrastructure (APM tools, continuous profiling) configured
✗runbooks_documentedNo runbooks directory or external runbook references found in docs
✓structured_loggingCustom logger module exists (aiohttp/log.py) with structured loggers
Security5/8 (63%)
✓automated_security_reviewCodeQL workflow configured in .github/workflows/codeql.yml for Python and JavaScript
—branch_protectionRequires GitHub admin API access to verify branch protection rules (skipped).
✓codeowners.github/CODEOWNERS file exists with team assignments (@asvetlov, @webknjaz)
—dast_scanningSkipped - library, not a deployed web service
✓dependency_update_automationDependabot configured (.github/dependabot.yml) and actively creating PRs
✓gitignore_comprehensive.gitignore properly excludes .env files, build artifacts, IDE configs, and OS files
✗log_scrubbingNo log sanitization/scrubbing mechanisms configured in logging setup
—pii_handlingSkipped - library without user data processing
—privacy_complianceSkipped - library without end-user data collection
—secret_scanningRequires GitHub admin API access to verify secret scanning configuration (skipped).
✓secrets_managementGitHub Actions uses secrets.* pattern, .env files gitignored
Task Discovery3/4 (75%)
✗backlog_healthSome open issues lack labels (e.g., several issues have empty labels array)
✓issue_labeling_systemConsistent labels exist (bug, enhancement, need pull request, Hacktoberfest, etc.)
✓issue_templates.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE directory and ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md exist with structured templates
✓pr_templates.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md exists with comprehensive sections
Product & Analytics0/2 (0%)
✗error_to_insight_pipelineNo error tracking to issue creation integration configured
✗product_analytics_instrumentationNo product analytics tools (Mixpanel, Amplitude, PostHog, etc.) instrumented
